Head to head
Janitor vs Little Warden
Little Warden is a precise SEO change detector. Janitor is whole-site monitoring with a branded client report. They overlap less than you might think. Here is an honest head to head.
Little Warden is a specialist out of Leeds, built to catch the moment something on a page changes: a title, a redirect, a robots.txt edit, a canonical. It adds custom XPath checks and Search Console sync. For deep SEO work it is genuinely strong.
Janitor is broader. It runs around two dozen checks across uptime, SSL, DNS, SEO, security, privacy and performance, then produces a branded client report with a 0 to 100 score. It is less of an SEO microscope and more of a whole-site health record you give a client.
Side by side
The comparison
Competitor figures checked against their live pricing pages.
| Feature | Janitor whole-site health | Little Warden SEO change detection |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $15/mo (5 sites) | £24.99/mo (20 URLs) |
| Free trial | 30 days, no card | 40 days, no card |
| Counts by | Sites and pages | URLs and checks per URL |
| Uptime monitoring | Limited | |
| SSL and domain expiry | ||
| SEO change detection | Core | Deep, with XPath |
| Custom XPath checks | – | |
| Search Console sync | – | |
| Email deliverability (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) | – | |
| Security and privacy checks | Limited | |
| Branded client PDF report | Change and renewal reports |
Little Warden pricing and features verified against littlewarden.com/pricing on 22 June 2026.
Fair is fair
Where Janitor wins
Breadth and the report
Seven categories of checks rolled into one branded PDF with a score, made for a client.
The checks an SEO tool skips
Uptime, email deliverability, security headers and cookie consent are all included.
Sites not URLs, cheaper entry
Counts by client site and starts at $15 a month, which usually maps better to a portfolio.
Fair is fair
Where Little Warden wins
SEO change detection
The deepest at catching title, redirect, robots.txt and canonical changes the instant they happen.
Custom XPath checks
Monitor any element on any page with a custom rule. Janitor does not do this.
Search Console sync
Brings Google Search Console data alongside its checks.
The short version
Which should you choose?
If you want one health report for clients
Best for agencies who bill a retainer and need a branded whole-site report each month.
If SEO change detection is the job
Best when catching the instant a page changes, with XPath and Search Console, is what you need.
Keep reading
Related pages
FAQ
Comparison FAQ
Does Janitor detect SEO changes like Little Warden?
It checks the SEO basics: meta and social tags, canonicals, sitemaps, robots and broken links. It does not match Little Warden for fine-grained change detection or custom XPath. For that, Little Warden is the specialist.
Which is better for an agency?
If you want one branded report covering the whole site for a client, Janitor fits better. If your work is deep SEO change monitoring on key pages, Little Warden is stronger. Some agencies use both.
How does pricing compare?
At the time of writing Janitor starts at $15 a month for 5 sites and Little Warden at £24.99 a month for 20 URLs. They count differently, so map each to your own portfolio.
Get started
Try Janitor on real client sites
Add a site, run the checks and send a branded report before you pay.
30-day free trial. No credit card required.